| |
News
& Articles
Human Resource
Management
Published in the Rochester Business Journal
Oct. 5, 2001
© 2001 HR Works, Inc.
Loath
to let go: The costs of not firing a mediocre employee
By Candace
Walters
Great companies
are not built with mediocre employees. Yet it's astonishing how often
managers postpone firing poor performers and troublesome employees.
In exploring
the reasons why CEOs fail, a 1999 article in Fortune magazine cited
the CEOs' chronic failure to place the right person in the right job,
and their repeated failure or unwillingness to fix people problems swiftly.
Some of those CEOs later admitted to selective deafness - ignoring an
inner voice that warned them of a problem, and refusing to listen to
those around them who saw the difficulty long before the CEO did. This
failure to deal with a subordinate who exhibits sustained poor performance
can deeply harm a company and produce a ripple effect that hurts morale
on many levels.
The costs
of postponing firing
The costs
associated with retaining poor performers are enormous, both in financial
and intangible terms. They include:
To some extent, employers can minimize the need to deal with poor performers
by adopting recruitment efforts and selection tools that ensure individuals
hired have the competencies for the position, and that they are comfortable
with the company's culture.
But instituting effective hiring practices isn't the entire answer.
For a variety of reasons, an employee's performance may deteriorate,
or other work-related problems may surface.
Why managers turn a blind eye
Ask any manager why this task is delayed, and he or she will say that
firing an employee is one of the most stressful and difficult parts
of the job. It means telling an individual, perhaps someone the manager
hired, that he or she is not good enough to get the job done.
Few managers will admit - or even realize - that they lack the emotional
will to dismiss a mediocre performer. Their anxieties, which are understandable,
generally manifest as one or more of the following excuses:
1. Fear that the terminated employee may sue. Anxiety over possible
legal action motivates many managers to put off firing an employee who
is part of a protected class. This concern is valid, although a company's
best protection against this type of legal action is documentation.
Employers must practice due diligence in documenting a worker's performance
and making a case for dismissal. Prior to dismissing an employee, it's
vital to involve the organization's HR manager and in some cases consult
with an employment-law attorney.
2. Belief that the poor performer can be coached. Determining when
an employee has been given enough time to prove he or she can do the
job is not an exact science. The Golden Rule teaches us to go easy on
people, to give them a second chance - and a third and a fourth. But,
as Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman write in the book "First,
Break All the Rules," people are true to their inherent natures
and rarely change much. Rather than try to remold their people, the
best managers seek ways to capitalize on the strengths of their employees'
natures.
3. Reluctance to tackle the task of replacing an employee. In
many industries, labor shortages persist, and recruitment-weary managers
may dread going back to the same shrinking pool. Yet the costs of retaining
a poor-performing employee far exceed firing him or her and starting
over.
4. Blind loyalty. Sometimes a manager is so enamored of a subordinate
- they may have worked and socialized together for years - that he or
she simply cannot see the employee's faults.
The right way
As difficult as it may be, there is a right way to terminate an individual's
employment. It involves training managers on how to:
- Establish and communicate well-defined employee expectations
that outline company rules of conduct and performance standards.
- Recognize early warning signs of unacceptable performance.
- Communicate with employees who are not making the grade, so there
are no surprises when dismissal occurs.
- Document the full details of performance discussions and reprimands.
- Ensure the final discussion is handled with sensitivity.
It's human nature for managers to struggle to deal with poor-performing
employees. But finding a way to overcome that difficulty - and filling
those positions with top performers - are essential for organizations
to remain viable and competitive.
Candace
Walters is president of HR Works, Inc., a regional human resource management
outsourcing and consulting firm serving 600 clients out of offices in
Fairport and Buffalo. HR Works provides part-time and interim HR managers,
direct placement of HR professionals, employee handbooks and supervisor
manuals, employee benefit statements, affirmative action programs, compensation
programs, training and more. To offer comments on this column or ideas
for future columns, write walters@hrworks-inc.com.
Top
|
|